Approximation.
mmm.
Way back in Calculus 1, we were finding
linear approximations for a function near
a point a.
Well how did that go?
Well it look like this, f was x is
approximately f of a,
right now linear approximation around the
point a plus the derivative at a
times how much the input has to change to
go from a to x, so times x
minus a.
And why does this make sense?
Well, the derivative is recording
infinitesimally how the
output changes as the input changes, so if
I take the ratio of output change to input
change and multiply by the input change.
This is approximately the output change.
Then I'm adding it to the output at the
point a,
and that'll give me about the value of the
function at x.
But let me put a little different
spin on this.
Instead of thinking about, you know, what
the derivative
means, the sub-ratio between output values
and input values.
Let's just think a little more naively,
let's just think that
I'm trying to write down a function which
has the same
value as my function f at the point a and
which
has the same derivative as my function f
at the point a.
We'll talk about this a little more
precisely,
let me give a name to this linear
approximation.
Let's call that g of x.
So g of x will be f of a plus f prime of a
times x minus a.
Now, what do I know about this function g?
Well, what's the value of g at a?
Alright, what happens if I plug in a for
x?
Well then I've got a minus a.
This is 0 in that case, so this whole term
is 0.
So g of a is just
this, f of a.
And what's the derivative of g at a?
Well what's just the derivative of g?
Alright.
Well it's the derivative of this constant
which is 0 plus the derivative of this.
This is a constant so it's f prime of a
times the
derivative of this, but what's the
derivative of this with respect to x?
It's just 1.
So the derivative of g regardless of what
x is, is just the derivative of f at a.
So look.
The function g here is a function whose
value at a is equal to the
value of f at a and whose derivative at a
is equal to the derivative of f at a.
I can do better.
So I'm going to define a new function.
I'm also going to call it g.
But it's going to be defined this way.
So g of x
will be defined as follows.
G of x will be f of a plus
the derivative of f at a times x minus a.
So this is just the linear approximation
to f at
the point a, and I'm going to add an extra
term.
Plus, the second derivative of f at a
divided by 2 times x minus a squared.
Why is that a good idea?
Well when I write it out like this,
this new function g, has three really
great properties.
First of all, g at the point a is just
equal to f of a.
If I plug in an a for x, that kills this
term, and this term.
All that I'm left with is just f of a.
Also, the derivative of
g, at the point a, is equal to the
derivative of f, at the point a.
Now that would have been true even if I
didn't have this extra term.
But, by including this extra term, it also
turns out that the second derivative
of g at the point a is equal to the second
derivative of f at the point a.
Now, I mean actually, the second
derivative of
g at any point is equal to the second
derivative of f at the point a.
But in particular, this is true.
So I've written down a function that not
only has the same value as
f does at a, not only has the same
derivative as f does at a.
But also has the same second derivative as
f does at a.
And, I can just keep on going.
So, here we go.
I'm going to define yet another function
that I'll again call g of x.
It's going to start out the exact same
way.
It's going to
start out with f of a plus the derivative
of f.
At the point a times x minus a.
So this is just the linear approximation
to f that we're used to.
Then, last time I added just one more
term, I'm going to add that term again,
the
second derivative of f, at the point a
divided by 2 times x minus a squared.
But I'll add another term.
I'm going to add this term.
The third derivative of the function f at
the
point a divided by 6 times x minus a
cubed.
Now the idea here is that this function g
is going to
turn out to agree with the function f at
the point a.
It's also going to have the same
derivative
as the function f at the point a.
It's also going to have the same second
derivative as the function
f at the point a, and it's going to have
the
same third derivative as the function f at
the point a.
Now to see this all I have to do is
differentiate.
Before I differentiate let me just point
out that g of a is equal to what?
Well if I plug in a for x, that kills this
term, this term, and this term.
These are all 0.
So the only thing that's left is f
of a.
Now.
Let's try differentiating.
Let's differentiate this once.
What's the derivative of g?
Well the differentiate g is going to
differentiate this.
So the derivative of this constant is
zero, the derivative of this constant
times x minus a, well that's the constant
f prime of a times the derivative
of x minus a which is one.
Plus what's the derivative of this term?
Well that's this constant.
F double prime of f at a divided
by 2 times the derivative of x minus a
squared, which is
2 times x minus a, times the derivative of
the inside, which is just 1.
Alright, and then I gotta add the
derivative of this term.
Well, that's this constant.
F triple prime at the point a divided by 6
times
the derivative of this.
Which is 3 times x minus a squared times
the derivative of the inside, which is
just 1.
And now, what happens if I plug in a.
What is g prime at a?
Well this term and this term both have an
x minus
a so they die the only thing that survives
is this.
So the derivative of the function g at the
point a is the same
as the derivative of the function f at the
point a.
Now what about the second derivative?
I've just got to differentiate this again.
So what's g double prime of x?
Well I don't need to differentiate the
zero, that's
just zero, this is a constant so that's
also zero.
What's the derivative of this?
Well it's this which is just f double
prime of
a, times the derivative of x minus a which
is 1.
And then what's the derivative of this?
Well it's this constant which is f triple
prime at a divided by 2,
times the derivative of x minus a squared.
Which is 2
times x minus a times the derivative of
the inside, which is just 1.
Now, what is this when I plug in a for x?
All right, what's g double prime at the
point a?
Well, when I plug in a for x, that kills
this term, and the only thing that
survives is this.
So the 2nd derivative of the function g at
the point a
is the same as the 2nd derivative of f at
the point a.
Now, what about the 3rd derivative?
Well, then, I just gotta differentiate
this.
So, what's g triple prime at x?
Well, it's 0 plus 0 plus the derivative of
this constant is 0.
Plus the derivative of this term.
Well, that's this constant times the
derivative of x minus a.
Well, this constant is just f triple prime
at a
times the derivative of x minus a which is
just one.
So, the third derivative of g at the point
a is equal to
the third derivative of F at the point A.
So this cubic polynomial not only
matches the function's value, but it also
matches the first, second
and third derivative of the function f at
the point a.
Let me make this more concrete.
Let me apply this to a specific function.
Here's a specific example.
Let's apply this to the function f of x
equals sine x.
I'm going to differentiate sine a bunch of
times.
So the derivative of sine is cosine.
The second derivative of sine, the
derivative of
cosine, is minus sine, so that if we
choke.
What's the third derivative of sine,
what's the
derivative of minus sine, that's negative
cosine x.
Now let's evaluate those at zero.
Well the function's value at zero and
what's sine at zero, that's zero.
What's the derivative at zero?
What's co sin at zero, that's one.
What's the second derivative at zero?
Well, that's negative sine of zero, that's
zero.
What's the third derivative at zero?
Well, that's negative cosine of zero,
that's negative one.
Now I've got all the pieces ready.
I'm ready to write down a polynomial that
has the same value,
the same derivative, the same second
derivative, and the same third derivative.
As sine does at the point zero.
Well in this case, g of x is what?
Well if the function's value is zero,
which is zero, plus the derivative of
zero, which is one, times x minus a, which
is just x plus
the second derivative at 0, which is 0
divided by 2 times x minus a squared,
plus the third derivative of the function
at 0, which
is negative 1, divided by 6 times x minus
a cubed.
And the a is 0 in this case, so just x
cubed.
I can simplify that a bit.
We'll now just get zero, I don't have to
write that down, x which is just zero
minus x cubed over six.
So there is my cubic polynomial.
So this is pretty great.
I've got this polynomial and it's supposed
to be a pretty good approximation to sine.
We'll let's take a look at a graph of sign
just to get an idea
just to get an idea of just how good an
approximation this polynomial really is.
Well, here's a graph of the function y
equals sin of x.
It has that familiar sinasoidal shape.
Let me super impose on this, the graph
of the cubic polynomial that we've been
studying.
Here's that that cubic polynomial.
This thick, green curve is the graph of y
equals x minus x cubed over six.
And remember how I got this polynomial.
This polynomial is rigged so that the
value of this polynomial
at zero is the same as the value of sine
at zero.
The derivative of this polynomial at zero
is
the same as the derivative of sine at
zero.
Same goes for the second derivative and
the third derivative, right?
If I differentiate this thing three times,
I get
the same thing as this, differentiated
three times at zero.
But it's interesting to note that even
though I've rigged this polynomial only to
match up with sine at zero at least in
value for second or third derivative.
This graph is sort of resembling sine.
I mean, this green curve, especially
around here,
is a pretty good approximation to the
graph
of the sine function.
I mean, it's obviously not great out here,
but at least in here, it's looking pretty
good.
We can also look at this numerically.
For example.
Sine of a half a radion is approximately,
to four decimal places, 0.4794, but what
is
this approximating function at one half?
What's g
of one half?
Well, that's one half minus one half cubed
over 6.
Well that's one half minus what is this?
That's one half to the third, that's an
eighth
or a sixth, that's one half minus a
fourty-eighth.
So instead of writing a half, I could
write 24/48ths Minus a forty-eight.
Well that's 23 forty-eights.
Well what's 23 forty-eights?
That's approximately
0.4792.
That is awfully close to sine of one half.
And whether we're thinking graphically or
numerically, we're seeing something
significant here.
Well way back in calculus 1, we thought
about approximating a function like this.
These linear approximations, but now we
getting the idea
that it'd be even better.
To approximate f not just by a degree
1 polynomial, but by a higher degree
polynomial.
And even better than polynomials are power
series.
Well, exactly.
A power series is a lot like a polynomial
that just keeps on going.
So if a degree ten polynomial is doing
better job than just
a linear approximation, and if a degree of
thousand polynomial would do an
even better job, maybe the power series,
if we just kept on going forever, we do
such a good job that the function would
actually be equal to some power series.
That is a huge thing to hope for.
But sometimes dreams come true.
[SOUND]