Let us now complete our inquiry into the early universe with even a little more speculative things. First something about general particular physics lore. The strengths of different interactions change with energy. And one of the basic paradigms is that the sufficiently high energies, different interactions become one. For example, the electromagnetic interaction and the nuclear weak force become unified at energies corresponding to temperatures about 10 to 16 degrees. And that has been actually experimentally proven. Similarly, it is believed that electroweak interaction and strong play force will become unified at energies of the order of 10^28 degrees kelvin, which corresponds to about 10^-35 seconds after the big bang. And then, to extend this, and this is purely speculative, those interactions become unified with gravity, at the plank time, 10^-43 seconds. Now, moving forward, forward in time, the grand unified interaction, splits, and that corresponds, to face transitions in the early universe. One of which, could be driving the inflation. So the temperatures of 10^28 degrees, there is electroweak interaction and a strong nuclear force. At temperatures at less than about 10^15 degrees electromagnetic and weak interactions split. This is the part that, that's been actually probed by accelerators. Deeper in the past we believed that electroweak interactions, strong nuclear force adjoined in what's called the Grand Unified Theories which are actually are not entirely complete, but they're reasonably strong theoretical background. And there are good reasons to believe that that's what actually happens. This is many orders of magnitude higher energies than what we can probe in terrestrial particle accelerators so in some sense, the early universe is our only means of actually testing these theories by seeing what they predict. It is possible, but, by no means certain, that it was this particular phase transition that splits the strong force from electroweak interaction that's responsible for driving the inflation. Now, let's look at another important fact in the universe. And that is that, there is a lot more matter than there is antimatter. Early on people thought that there could be a symmetry, but there was simply no trace of substantial amounts of antimatter in the universe. We would have seen much more in terms of annihilation radiation and so on. Also, people who look for cosmic rays look hard to see what is the balance between Particles and anti particles and all of the anti particles that have been seen so far, can be easily explained through normal interactions. So the universe is predominantly made out of matter. Which. Anti matter being a negligible fraction there of. How did that come about. This leads us into the topic of Cosmic Baryogenesis. The worded protons and neutrons come from as opposed to the equal numbers of anti protons and anti neutrons. Theoretical ground for this was actually laid by great Soviet physicist Andrei Sakharov as early 1967. He came up with three conditions that need to be satisfied for this to work. First, Baryon number, which we think is conserved, must be violated. And, we do not have any experimental evidence for this. But it's not impossible. It has been predicted by a number of more modern theories, it just hasn't been observed yet. Second, there has to be charge and charge parity violation. For those of you familiar with basic concepts in particle physics, you know what that means, that the reversals of charge or reversals of charge and parity of spins can make Arrow of time, glide away. This has actually been experimentally demonstrated as early as the 1960s. And finally, there has to be some departure from thermal equilibrium. And the expansion of the universe provides a natural way to do this. Since universe expands, the time is not homogeneous. There is a difference between 1 direction of time and the other, and that's what provides the necessary condition. So nowadays most people believe that something like this was indeed responsible for establishing the asymmetry between matter and anti-matter. Note, in the early universe, that could have been vast amounts of antimatter. It just annihilated and what's left, the small fraction that's left is regular matter. Finally, let's talk about Planck Units. This is a system of units devised by Max Planck in 1899. Prior to relativity and prior to quantum theory. He asked a simple question. Meters and seconds and such are simply human conventions, are there actually natural units, that he can derive from, say universal contants, such as Newton's gravity constant, or speed of light, or Planck's constant. And indeed, they are. Shown here combinations of such fundamental physical constants that yield elementary units of time, or length, or mass. And so for the time it's 10^-43 seconds and this is called Planck time. For space is about 10^-33 centimeters, that's called the Planck length. And for mass, it's about 10^-5 grams, which is called the Planck mass. Similarly, you can derive units for other physical quantities. And then there are derived units. In any case, the advantage of planck units is that, indeed. They do not depend on any arbitrary conventions. They really are given by the constants of nature. But that doesn't necessarily mean that they're somehow magical. We use them. As limiting units for quantum gravity say but we don't really know. And they may or may not be entirely relevant. Nevertheless, they're a useful set of units to consider when thinking about very early universe. So as we approach the Planck era our knowledge breaks down. We do not yet have a working quantum theory of gravity. Not for the lack of trying. Many smart theorists have been working on this for a long time. And today we have String theory or M-theory or Branes and things like that. It's fair to say that none of those have yet produced a convincing unifying theory that will unify quantum physics in gravity. Nevertheless there are prospects that that might happen. There are also theoretical attempts to think what was this implied beyond the Big Bang. One of the interesting theories is the so called Ekpyrotic cosmology, which essentially states that colliding branes, which are essentially multi-dimensional supernova particles, can dissipate enough energy to create all of the mass energy in the universe. There's also the concept of the String Landscape, saying that there about 10^500 different universes. Each of which could have different physical constants and different laws of nature. Needless to say this is completely speculative at this point. In either case the early universe certainly provides a high-energy physics laboratory at levels that will never be achievable on this planet. And so the unification of high-energy physics, particle physics and cosmology is likely to get even stronger. Next, we will talk about the contents of the universe.