1 00:00:00,012 --> 00:00:06,282 , Remember back before, when we talked about the product rule? You know, it goes 2 00:00:06,294 --> 00:00:11,835 like the derivative of f times g is the derivative of f times g plus f times the 3 00:00:11,847 --> 00:00:17,397 derivative of g. It's a little bit mysterious considering that the product 4 00:00:17,409 --> 00:00:22,030 rule has a plus in it. But we proved this previously, just by going back to the 5 00:00:22,042 --> 00:00:26,827 definition of derivative in terms of limit. And, calculating the necessary 6 00:00:26,839 --> 00:00:32,073 limit to show that, this product rule was in fact valid. We've already seen a proof 7 00:00:32,085 --> 00:00:36,583 for the products rule. Originally we justified the product rule by going back 8 00:00:36,595 --> 00:00:41,349 to the limit definition of derivative and manipulating that limit. But maybe that 9 00:00:41,361 --> 00:00:46,112 proof didn't speak to you, so now there's another trick that we can use. We can use 10 00:00:46,124 --> 00:00:51,440 logarithms to replace the product with a sum. Let's see how. So let's suppose that 11 00:00:51,452 --> 00:00:56,836 f of x is bigger than 0, and g of x is bigger than 0, say for all x. I just want 12 00:00:56,836 --> 00:01:02,750 to do this for positive functions. Okay. Now I'm going to use logs, so let's take 13 00:01:02,762 --> 00:01:08,570 the log of f of x times g of x. And what do I know about logs? Logs turn products 14 00:01:08,582 --> 00:01:14,857 into sums. So the log of f of x times g of x is the log of f of x plus the log of g 15 00:01:14,869 --> 00:01:21,696 of x. I'm going to differentiate both sides of this equation. So the derivative 16 00:01:21,708 --> 00:01:28,408 log is 1 over, and by the chain rule, that's 1 over the inside function times 17 00:01:28,420 --> 00:01:33,420 the derivative of the inside function, which in this case is the derivative of f 18 00:01:33,432 --> 00:01:38,330 of x times g of x. That's what I'd like to compute. What's the driv of the other 19 00:01:38,342 --> 00:01:43,075 side? Well the derivative of the log is 1 over, so 1 over the inside function times 20 00:01:43,087 --> 00:01:47,865 the derivative of the inside function, plus log of g of x is 1 over the inside 21 00:01:47,877 --> 00:01:53,161 function times the derivative of the inside function. Now if I multiply both 22 00:01:53,173 --> 00:01:58,819 sides by f of x times g of x, what happens? Well if I multiply this side by f 23 00:01:58,831 --> 00:02:05,148 of x times g of x, I've then isolated the derivative of the product. So this is just 24 00:02:05,160 --> 00:02:11,117 the derivative of f of x times g of x. If I multiply this side by f of x times g of 25 00:02:11,129 --> 00:02:17,224 x, f of x times 1 over f of x is just 1, but I'm left with a factor of g of x times 26 00:02:17,236 --> 00:02:23,615 f prime of x plus, and if I multiply this term by f of x times g of x, g of x times 27 00:02:23,627 --> 00:02:29,693 1 over g of x is just one, but I'm left with an f of x, so f of x times g prime of 28 00:02:29,705 --> 00:02:34,706 x. And look, this is the product rule. The derivative of the product is the, in this 29 00:02:34,718 --> 00:02:38,458 case, g of x times f prime of x plus f of x times g prime of x. So, I mean, the 30 00:02:38,470 --> 00:02:43,371 order's a little bit different, but it is the product rule. So we've justified the 31 00:02:43,383 --> 00:02:48,591 product rule another way using logarithms, but that raises a question, what's the 32 00:02:48,603 --> 00:02:53,279 point of having multiple proofs of a single mathematical fact? It's not as if 33 00:02:53,291 --> 00:02:58,210 having 2 different proofs of the product rule makes the product rule any more true. 34 00:02:58,314 --> 00:03:03,082 What this argument has is in its favor is that it's showing off a nice trick that 35 00:03:03,094 --> 00:03:07,946 you can do with logarithms. There's a theme that products and quotients are much 36 00:03:07,958 --> 00:03:13,241 more complicated than sums and differences Armed with logarithms, we can convert 37 00:03:13,253 --> 00:03:18,847 difficult products and quotients into much easier sums and differences, and that's a 38 00:03:18,859 --> 00:03:19,823 huge win for us.