1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,003 Okay. So now we are ready to talk about entanglement which plays a central role in 2 00:00:05,003 --> 00:00:15,000 quantum computation. So, let's come back to a two qubits system. And, you know, 3 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:21,006 which let's say again, consists of, consists of atomic qubits where our first 4 00:00:21,006 --> 00:00:31,000 qubit happens to be in the state superposition α0|0> + α1|1>. And the 5 00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:36,009 second qubit happens to be in the superposition, β0|0> + β1|1>. So now we 6 00:00:36,009 --> 00:00:43,004 could ask, what's the state of the two qubit system? Well, the answer is very 7 00:00:43,004 --> 00:00:51,004 simple. What you do is, you just take a product of these, according to this rule. 8 00:00:51,004 --> 00:01:01,000 It's sort of the obvious rules. So you, the amplitude of |00> is, is just 9 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:19,000 α0β0|00>. The amplitude of |01> is just α0β1|01>. The amplitude of |10> is 10 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:32,006 α1β0|10>. And the amplitude of |11> is just α1β1|11>. So for example, suppose we, 11 00:01:32,006 --> 00:01:42,001 you know the, the, the states of the two qubits where, the first one was in the, in 12 00:01:42,001 --> 00:01:53,007 the plus state, and the second one happened to be in the state -3/√2, 13 00:01:53,007 --> 00:02:13,006 √3/2, sorry. Then the composite state, this is, the composite system is in the 14 00:02:13,006 --> 00:02:35,008 state where 1/2√2|00> - √3/2√2|01> + 1/2√2|10> - √3/2√2|11>. Okay. So 15 00:02:35,008 --> 00:02:44,000 that's, that's quite simple. Okay. So now, we could ask the opposite question. So 16 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:49,000 suppose you have given the state of the composite system, determine the state of 17 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:56,000 each of the two qubits. So, we, we'll just continue with our previous example.Suppose 18 00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:05,000 you are given that the state of the composite system is, is this. Okay, so 19 00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:10,000 given the state of this system, now you want to determine, what's the state of 20 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:14,008 each qubit. How would you do that? Well the answer is clear, what you would do is 21 00:03:14,008 --> 00:03:29,001 you take the state and you would factor it in the form (α0|0> + α1|1>) (β0|0> + 22 00:03:29,001 --> 00:03:37,006 β1|1>). And this factorization may not be unique but we don't care about the overall 23 00:03:37,006 --> 00:03:43,007 phases. And so for example, in this previous case, what, what, we could do is 24 00:03:43,007 --> 00:03:59,003 we could factorize it as (1/√2|0> + 1/√2|1>) (1/2|0> - √3/2|1>. And 25 00:03:59,003 --> 00:04:06,002 we could say, that's the state of the first system. Now of course, we could also 26 00:04:06,002 --> 00:04:12,003 you know, this, this product will remain the same if we, if we apply minus sign to 27 00:04:12,003 --> 00:04:20,004 this and apply minus sign to that. So in other words, we could, we could make this 28 00:04:20,004 --> 00:04:27,008 state be minus this, minus that, and we could make this state be minus this, plus 29 00:04:27,008 --> 00:04:32,005 that. And the product of these two would still be the same. In fact, we could apply 30 00:04:32,005 --> 00:04:36,000 any phase here and opposite phase here and the product would still be the same with 31 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:42,000 the phases, as long as the phase is cancelled. But of course, the phase, the 32 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:46,000 overall phase of a qubit doesn't matter. So, we don't really care about that phase 33 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:50,000 information. What we care about is, understanding what's the, what's the state 34 00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:56,007 of each qubit up to a phase. So now we could ask, given an arbitrary such state 35 00:04:56,007 --> 00:05:07,000 of the composite system, can you always factorize it in this way? And the answer 36 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:12,000 is no. There are states which you can not factorize in this way and this is, these 37 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:20,000 are the so-called entangled states of two qubits. This is quite surprising. The 38 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:27,006 reason is, that, a state that you could not factorize, for such a state, each of 39 00:05:27,006 --> 00:05:32,007 the two qubits. The first qubit and the second qubit, by itself does not have is 40 00:05:32,007 --> 00:05:36,008 not in a definite state, it does not have a quantum state. All we can say is that 41 00:05:36,008 --> 00:05:42,007 the composite system is in some quantum state, it's in some superposition. But if 42 00:05:42,007 --> 00:05:47,004 you look at just the first qubit by itself, it's not in any given quantum 43 00:05:47,004 --> 00:05:52,007 state. The way we describe it is, it's entangled with other qubit. The two qubits 44 00:05:52,007 --> 00:05:57,001 are, are completely entangled with each other to the point where neither of them 45 00:05:57,001 --> 00:06:05,004 has an identity of its own. So let's see an example. So a canonical example of 46 00:06:05,004 --> 00:06:12,006 entanglement of two qubits entanglement is the Bell State. So it's this very simple 47 00:06:12,006 --> 00:06:20,006 state. It's equal superposition of |00> and |11>. So the claim is that, 48 00:06:20,006 --> 00:06:27,000 if the two qubits are in this joint state, they are completely entangled with each 49 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:32,008 other to the point where you cannot really talk about what the state of each qubit 50 00:06:32,008 --> 00:06:39,007 individually is. So, why is that? Well, let's try to factorize this. Let's try to 51 00:06:39,007 --> 00:06:51,001 write this as (α0|0> + α1|1>), so let's try to factorize it, (β0|0> + β1|1>). 52 00:06:51,001 --> 00:06:59,000 And let's show that no such α is such complex amplitudes α0, α1, 53 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:06,000 β0, β1 exists. So why is that? Well we know that the amplitude of 54 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:17,003 |00> is the product of this and this. So, α0β0 = 1/√2. We also know 55 00:07:17,003 --> 00:07:29,000 that |11>'s amplitude is α1β1 = 1/√2. What these two things facts imply, 56 00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:48,001 that α0, β0, α1, β1, they are all non-zero. Okay. But now lets go back and 57 00:07:48,001 --> 00:07:54,008 look at the fact that what's the amplitude of |01>. Well, that's zero and so what that 58 00:07:54,008 --> 00:08:01,009 means is that, α0β1 must be equal to zero. But that's not possible because what 59 00:08:01,009 --> 00:08:09,009 we said is that all four amplitudes have to be non-zero so that's a contradiction. 60 00:08:09,009 --> 00:08:19,001 So what this shows is that, we just cannot write this state, we cannot factor this 61 00:08:19,001 --> 00:08:25,007 state as a state of the first qubit and a state of the second qubit. Now, we are 62 00:08:25,007 --> 00:08:32,000 going to study the properties of this Bell state, this entangled state over the 63 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:37,009 course of this, the rest of this lecture and the next lecture. But for now, we are 64 00:08:37,009 --> 00:08:44,003 going to study what happens if you measure this Bell state. So, imagine that you 65 00:08:44,003 --> 00:08:50,009 create this Bell state and now you take these two qubits, these two particles and 66 00:08:50,009 --> 00:08:55,009 you separate them by a great distance from each other. Well of course, none of these 67 00:08:55,009 --> 00:09:00,002 affects the state of the particles. So the state of the particle is still |00> + |11>. 68 00:09:00,002 --> 00:09:06,003 What happens when you measure the first qubit? Well, when you measure the 69 00:09:06,003 --> 00:09:12,004 first qubit, you see zero with probability, well the square of the 70 00:09:12,004 --> 00:09:18,000 magnitude of this which is a half. But what happens when you, if you, if you 71 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:22,006 actually happen to see a zero, measure zero? Well, remember the rules of 72 00:09:22,006 --> 00:09:27,006 measurement? What they tell us is, that if you see a zero, the new state is going to 73 00:09:27,006 --> 00:09:32,000 be determined like this. You just cross off the parts of the superposition that 74 00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:37,008 are inconsistent with the measurement outcome, and you re-normalize. So the new 75 00:09:37,008 --> 00:09:42,003 state is |00>. On the other hand, if you see a one, you see that with 76 00:09:42,003 --> 00:09:47,009 probability half, and the new state would be |11>. Now what happens if after 77 00:09:47,009 --> 00:09:58,000 this, you measure the second qubit. Well, the answer is clear. If you measure, 78 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:08,008 second qubit, well in this case, you would see zero with probability one. And in this 79 00:10:08,008 --> 00:10:15,007 case, you would see one with probability one. So it's as though, you know, there, 80 00:10:15,007 --> 00:10:20,002 there is this, there is this strange coincidence between, between the two 81 00:10:20,002 --> 00:10:25,000 measurements of these two different particles even though might be arbitrarily 82 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:31,007 far apart. Well, so far this not, this is something that you should be able to 83 00:10:31,007 --> 00:10:37,004 reconcile with your intuition because you could say, well, wouldn't you get exactly 84 00:10:37,004 --> 00:10:42,008 the same result if, when these two particles were initially entangled, they 85 00:10:42,008 --> 00:10:47,009 flipped a coin to determine whether were they going to act as, as they were in 86 00:10:47,009 --> 00:10:53,000 state |00> or they were going act as they were in state |11>. And then once they 87 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:58,001 are separated, they just, happen to be in that state. It's as though you flipped a 88 00:10:58,001 --> 00:11:06,004 coin when you created this state. Well, it turns out that it's not so simple. And, in 89 00:11:06,004 --> 00:11:13,000 the next video we'll talk about the EPR Paradox or the Einstein Podolsky Rosen 90 00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:20,000 Paradox which shows you just how strange entanglement is.