TRUST THE TIMING 11-7-97 Canoga Park, CA All right, I'll say good day to you this day of your time. How are you all? We will, as usual, take this opportunity, once again, to thank each and every one of you for allowing this transmission to occur, through this particular gateway, at this time. Once again, each and every time your civilization allows such an interaction to occur, our civilization benefits by giving us an opportunity to experience, through each and every one of you individually, that many more aspects of creation and this expands our understanding of all that creation can be. So we thank you for this gift. That is what we will say. This day of your time, however, what we will not say is what you typically call or refer to as our usual monologue. We will for a variety of reasons, none of which we will discuss at the present, simply begin with sharing. Yes, good day. You, then you. Number two, do you know who you are? All right, number one good day! Q: Hello Bashar. B: And to you, good day. Q: I see there is a workshop I want to take, that's up on the board, with the channel about the nature of reality. B: All right, that is up to you. Q: But in the mean time..... B: In the mean time, yes? Q: I still have some questions I would like to pursue off of our last conversation. B: Yes. Q: In which I understood the nature of reality as sort of frames of frozen time. B: That is one way of looking at it. Q: Okay. B: First of all, please understand all of the things that we will be saying are conveniences of your third density reality concept. There is no reality, except your definition of it, and that's what reality is; that's the fundamental truth. Anything else will be a convenient way of relating to the idea of yourself as or through the concept you call reality. Does that make sense? Q: Yes it does. B: All right, so all of these terms are conveniences and with that in mind, then do continue. Q: Okay, with the analogy of sort of a film strip. B: Yes, frames in a film strip, yes. Q: The idea is that consciousness moves through those frames giving the illusion of passage of time. B: Similar to the light in a projector moving through the frames of film and projecting them on the screen to give the illusion of motion, yes. Q: Right. And my confusion about that analogy is that when we are saying that your consciousness is looking at this one now, through this one particular frame, and then it moves to the next frame. B: This is a convenience remember. Q: Right. B: Yes. Q: But with that analogy, if you have this happens now, and then something else happens; that's a passage of time. B: That's the experience of creating linear time, yes, even though it's actually all happening at once. Q: So our consciousness isn't then really only focused in one frame? B: No, but you can create the experience that it is. Q: So how is it that we're tricking ourselves into thinking that our consciousness is only focused on that one frame. B: By allowing yourself to forget where the rest of it is focused. Q: So the opposite of that, if we want to be aware of all of...is it possible to be aware of.... B: In some senses, yes, although there will always be different meanings to /is it possible/, from different levels. Because from different levels, different degrees of awareness are germane to certain levels, and more than that may not be convenient nor appropriate for what it is you said you want to experience in that level. It is always possible from some level, yes. But you have to, in some senses, be in that level to experience it in a way that is germane for that level. Q: Okay. B: There are still ways to experience it all at once in what you call physical-linear, space-time reality, but it may be that you will experience it for a fleeting moment and then you will re-limit yourself again, in order to apply the experience in a physical- linear, space-time way. Does that make sense? Q: Well it does, except I'm sort of still having a problem whenever we talk about you do this, then you do that. B: Well, yes, but that is just the conveniences of linear space-time to speak that way. Q: Okay. B: Don't fight it, that's what it is, that's the reality of linear-space- time. This, then that, but at the same time from another level you can understand that what appears to be one moment after another is simply the same moment from another point of view, experienced in a linear fashion. But that's what physical reality is defined as. Q: Okay. B: That's the definition you are allowing yourself to experience. You don't have to be confused by it, that's simply what the definition of physical experience is, linear space-time. Does that make sense? Q: Not completely, but I think I'll pursue it in the seminar and I'd like to ask you a different question off of the last.... another conversation we had..... B: Yes, but I would like to ask you a question first. Q: Right. B: Can you address what is the confusion about this, because the confusion you are saying you have implies that you are looking to create or experience a certain affect that you believe you are not getting. Q: Well I do...there is something that I want to accomplish.... B: Such as? Q: I want to be able to move to different realities, different viewpoints of the same moment. B: Perhaps the confusion comes from the understanding of the structure of the sentence itself and what it means, "I want to move to different realities," but you see if you did, you wouldn't be the same you. You follow? Q: Well couldn't I be a very similar me? B: You could be a very similar but it wouldn't be the same and maybe that's where the confusion is coming from? Q: Well as long as I can maintain the same memories and self-image and so on...it wouldn't matter. B: But you see you do that all the time, don't you? Or don't you know that you do that all the time? Maybe that's the confusion? Q: Well, but I'm not doing it to the degree I want to. B: Yes you are. Q: Oh? B: You're just not aware of it, that's the point. You are already, all of you, doing it all the time to the absolute infinite degree. The degree of awareness that you're doing it all the time is the key, not that you have to learn to do it. The degree of awareness that you already are doing it is what you are asking to have expanded. That's the difference and it can create all the difference in the world. You are already doing it all the time in order to even experience the illusion of motion. You, in fact, have to be doing it all the time; similar to the idea that in order to experience the illusion of motion in a film you have to go from one frame to the next. Q: Yes, I understand that. What I'm saying is I want more of a conscious control and ability to leap to different film strips rather than stay in this one film strip where there is, for example, a lot of evil that I don't want to have in my reality. B: Are you running away from something? Q: Yes, I would like to. B: Well, that's your problem, you can't. You can only transform. Remember, ultimately there is only one here and now. If you are trying to run away from something, saying it has no business in your here and now, that's what makes you firmly stick in that here and now. Because there is no such thing as something that has no business in your here and now, if it is there. Now, I understand that if you have different degrees of preferences as to how to experience what you call evil and/or negativity, but you cannot run from it because the only way you can experience it is through your own energy, anyhow. And that means that you simply have to transform your own energy, but that doesn't mean that you are running from it. That means you are being at peace with it. Q: But can I do that and be at peace with it by going to another reality where it doesn't exist or that I have.... B: No, no. Q: That's what I don't understand? B: NO, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no what you can do is understand that you will create the experience of having gone to another reality by being at peace with it. Being at peace with it, in that sense, will not take you to another reality. You will experience, however, paradoxically, that you are in another reality by being at peace with it. Q: Evil would still be in the reality that I'm in, I would just be at peace with it, is that what you are saying? B: Yes, you see what you are attempting to do is paradoxical and that's why you have to let it be. In other words, if you're really looking at a higher level of understanding, then when you talk about the idea of the Infinite, which is, in a sense, what you are talking about in terms of what it is you want to experience. In other words, you're talking about learning how to use the Infinite in order to make a shift. Well if you're talking about the Infinite, how can the Infinite be the Infinite minus something? Everything must be there for it to be infinite and to be able to be used as an infinite source. So when you are talking about making a shift, paradoxically, it is not that you are shifting away from something, as it really isn't there anymore, because there can be no such thing as something no longer being, because everything that is will always be. But the idea is that when you learn your relationship to it and can be at peace with it, so to speak, in so many words, then it won't matter that it's still here. You will simply gain the experience of the relationship to it that you prefer to have and experientially it may seem as if it is gone; but paradoxically, it cannot be gone. It's simply that you have adjusted your definition of your relationship to it to make it experientially appear as if it doesn't effect you any more, in a negative way. Does that make sense to you? Q: No, because I think of other conversations where we talked about the fact that everything that can possibly be thought of, everything that ever could happen or has happened, is all existing right now in this one moment, so that every type of planet Earth with every possible combination of anything exists in some reality. So.... B: Yes, and when your talking about discrete different frequency levels like frame to frame to frame, yes, you can say, one Earth doesn't necessarily have what you would call the experience overall of evil. But the paradox is there is no way to experience that Earth unless you accept what the reality is, that you're in now. Q: Okay that I understand, just.... B: No you don't. Q: Okay. B: That's the confusion. You still think you are moving away from something and going to something else, and that's not what's happening. You're simply shifting your point of view, but you remain here. If you wish a stronger analogy, it's that the Earth is changing in you, you're not going to another Earth. Q: Okay. B: You're creating the Earth within yourself by total acceptance of the Earth you've already created, total, total, total, total unconditional acceptance of whatever is for its own sake, for its own validity including the concept you call evil. That's the paradox. When you totally accept it for what it is then you no longer have to experience its effect. Q: I believe that.... B: Well where's the confusion? Q: Well my confusion is the step after that. Once I've totally accepted it, how.... B: There is no step. There is only the experience of total acceptance. And the experience of total acceptance is bliss, and in bliss there is not the experience of what you call evil. Q: But can I not then choose some other type of reality? B: But why would you need to? If everything is bliss, why would you need to? You see you're still making it a conditional separation and as long as you make it a conditional separation, you will always be confused. If you are in bliss, why would you need anything to be different than it is? It is that need for something to be different that actually creates the schism within you and the perpetuation of your experience of what you're calling evil, but I experience no such schism. We are unconditionally loving of All That Is, in all of it's manifestation and as such we don't need anything to be different. And paradoxically, therefore, we experience it as different from you. Q: What if it wasn't a need, what if it was just curiosity to see if.... B: You can't get out of it with squirrelly words. The point is, if you are in bliss, you won't care. What's going on right here and right now will absorb your curiosity more fully than you can possibly imagine. You won't be curious about anything other than what is. And, paradoxically, if you are absolutely, totally consumed in curiosity with what is, then what is can constantly change into whatever else it can be that is representative of the degree of curiosity you have about whatever else what is can be. But that's the way you have to go about it. You can't do it in the sense of detachment from what is and going to where you think is different because it can't work that way. The only thing that can become or appear to become something else is what is here, and you have to fully accept it and be in love with it, all of it, in order for it to appear to be something else. And when it is something you are fully in love with you won't want to be somewhere else. But then when you don't want to be somewhere else, where you are can become everything it can possibly be. You follow that? Q: I do. B: That's what needs to be.