*Projection And Openness In Communication* Q: Previously we explored the idea that our physical environment around us was a projection, whereby the light of our consciousness shined through the ideas and agreement patterns that we had... B: Yes. Q: ... and projected into existence the environment. B: Yes. Q: Much in the same way that our movie projectors project through film. Tonight you touched on the concept of energies that were transmitted through our physical bodies that could also alter the physical environment. B: Yes. Q: Is our consciousness and our body the projected viewpoint in which these energies are being translated through the body and thereby... B: In a sense. Q: ... environment? B: Yes, now do remember and recognize that we are utilizing colloquial terms in your language. The idea, of course, is that you actually are the event you are experiencing. And even the idea of projecting the energy out is, in and of itself, an illusion. Q: So you're looking at a linear concept based on... B: Yes. Q: Okay. That linear... good. That ends that one. Another question -- a completely different subject. A friend of mine has fallen in love and has a great desire and excitement and love for a woman who is married and has two children. And he's married and he's with another's wife, and they have two children. And he wishes to bring this about... he's concerned with the fact that the - because of our cultural structural - the invitations will invite the other people to create misery, unhappiness, dissension, these sorts of things. And I would like if you would simply reflect... B: Our suggestion would be the openness and honesty of communication between all individuals concerned. Sharing the feelings, sharing the attractions, and allowing all individuals to recognize that if they are connected to each other, then the connection of one of those individuals to another individual in another group that is connected to itself, is a reflection of the idea that perhaps all of those individuals are more closely connected than they think. If it is an opportunity for everyone to be, as you say, out in the open with their feelings, and share and know and trust that they can get reflections from each other without feeling threatened, without feeling cheated upon or chastised in that way, then perhaps they can all learn much about their individual abilities for the expression of unconditional love to each other. And can explore the idea of the boundaries that your society has set, and perhaps allow them - in whatever way will maintain everyone's integrity - to dissolve. Q: That's lovely. B: For when certain ideas like that sometimes are explored, you may find that the initial inclination -- or what you think is the initial inclination -- may not be what follows through. It may simply be for the purpose of allowing certain forms of communication to open up. And once those communications have been opened up, the original intentions may no longer be necessary. Q: Yes. And one of the individuals involved is holding to a consideration that her love for the individual is somehow a betrayal of her friend - who is the individual's wife. B: Once again: if there is the openness of communication and integrity within all individuals, then there can be a sharing and a deepening of understanding and a deepening of the love, that more often that not, anything that you call difficulty in relationships usually stems from what is /not/ said rather than what /is/ said. Q: Yes, that's very classic. Actually one of the individuals that this person subscribes to, claims - or puts out the concept that - undelivered communications was the prime source of their present time problems. B: Yes. Q: Thank you. B: Thank you.