*Planetary Reflections and Accessing Knowledge* Q: For a long time I've been exploring the symbols of Astrology. B: Yes. Q: Before I came here I thought that... the closest I got to my understanding it was that maybe we were co-creating it with the planets as archetypes? B: In a sense, you are. Q: But now you've kind of opened up a new exploration for me. Can you give me some more insight into how... specifically, for example, I notice that a lot of my friends who want to come here with me have planets at 23 Libra; which in our Zodiac would be where Spika, Arcturus are. B: Ah, in this way, simply recognize that our basic fundamental understanding of the tool you call Astrology, from the point of view within your system, is that it is your, let us say, equational representation of the vibratory energy that represents the agreements that have been made between all the individuals within your society, collectively. You follow me? Q: Oh, yes. B: Does that assist you? Q: Who helps make up those agreements? Do we all do it together? B: Yes. Q: Is there no master planner? B: Yes, all of you together is "THE MASTER PLANNER" of your system. Q: Do we do this in our dream states? B: Many times, many times in what you call in-between lives, and at any given moment you are actually doing it because you all exist on all different levels, simultaneously. Q: Then how would we all pick planets at 23 Libra if we wanted to have this type of experience? B: It is not so much that you pick it in that way, you simply /are/ that vibratory agreement. And thus, the physiological symbol that represents that idea is reflected to you in the externalized universe. Q: Okay. B: Do you follow me? Q: Yes. Can you tell me more about 23 Libra, and how it has to do with you and all of you? B: It will be, to some degree, some of the idea of the balance of polarity, and in this way, with specific regard to what you call Arcturus, will also be the cognition for emotional balance. It will be representative of a potential of high emotional activity, coupled with very, let us say, rarefied and/or esoteric service in many different ways. You follow me? Q: Oh, yes. B: Thank you. Perhaps there may be more we can discuss on this at another time. Q: I hope so. B: You /what?/ Q: I've got tons of questions; whenever you are ready just let me know. B: Whenever /you/ are ready to answer them, perhaps, that is when the discussion will take place. Q: Okay. B: Do not hope, unless you choose to. And remember: if you choose to hope, hope implies despair; hope is not knowing. You follow me? Q: Ah, yeah, it's... B: Are you sure? Q: I'll have to think about what you said... B: If you /hope/ something will happen, you are not sure. You are despairing that it might not.... so you think that you have to HOPE! Simply know what reality you are, know what is true for you, and you will not need hope, because you will simply know. You will have the knowledge that you seek. /Recognize/ that a question is the answer, judged and removed from you. But you are giving yourself the opportunity to recognize that if you can ask a question, it is a reflection that you already contain the answer, or the concept of the question would have never occurred to you. You can only conceive of what you contain. You follow me? Q: Yes. B: Thus, every question each and every one of you /has/ is an indication that you already are the answer, but are judging yourself not to be. So you create a reminder that you are the answer, and you call that reminder /a/ /question/. Q: Well, that's true, sometimes I feel that we... that I know everything, but it seems that it feels very arrogant. You know? B: No, no, no, no, no. You know everything you need to know to function as the being you chose to be. Q: Right, but sometimes I feel a seepage of another being that knows, and it is... B: There are always going to be cognitions of what you call many different levels, but understand: no being in the universe knows more than you about what you need to know to be you, because you are the only you. You follow me? Q: Yes. B: That is all there is to it. Q: But what if... B: It may be that their scope of perception may be broader than your own, but that does not mean that you are not aware of all the things you need to know to continue to function as you. If you did not know even one fragment, even one small variable, if you were unable to know even one small variable of the idea it takes to be you, you wouldn't be here. Because you need the total equation to be where you are. You follow me? Q: Thanks dad. B: You are welcome, my child. (AUD: much laughter) Sharing! Q2: What you just said was that I don't know and I don't have access to all the knowledge of the universe, that I only have access to that knowledge which enables me to be me. And to do those things which I have chosen to do. B: Simply, by the definition of the reality you have projected yourself into. It is not that you do not have, let us say, connection to All That Is but perhaps, you have limited your access so that you can in fact function as the being you are choosing to function as, in /this/ reality. Q2: Since, on the other hand, the universe is holographic... B: Yes. Q2: ... then we do have all the information. B: Oh yes. I did not say that you did not have it, I simply suggested that you, many of you, create inaccessibility to much of it, simply because it does not serve you to be who you are. But you have /total/ accessibility to ALL the information that lets you be who you are, in the reality you have chosen to be. Q2: Yeah. B: Thank you.