*Parallel Versions of Atlantis* Q: A while ago I asked you a question. I said, "to what degree am I talking to myself, when I talk to you?" B: One hundred per cent. Q: You said one hundred percent, yeah. Do you have any judgment? No, you couldn't have any judgment. B: Let me see... we could if we wanted to. Q: Do you consider that the accuracy of the statements that you are making... B: We do not deal in accuracy; we deal in validity. Q: Validity. B: Not the same thing. Q: Right. Understood. Do you feel that the validity of your statements are more valid than mine? B: For me or for you? Q: As an example, if I were to make a statement regarding Atlantis, and you make a statement regarding Atlantis... B: Yes? Q: Is there a consideration that yours is more valid, has more validity? B: Accuracy is a judgment that there must be one truth, and measure everything against it. And there is no "one truth." There is mass conscious experience, yes, and there are many truths within it. "The" truth is composed of all truths. Q: Mhmm. B: Does that clarify the idea? Q: To some degree. B: It goes along with the understanding that when we say you are your collectedly total whole universe unto yourself, we mean it literally. You can have experienced, what you deign to have experienced, within /your/ own experience of the idea of Atlantis; and for you in your reality, that was your experience - until you decide to change it. Q: Mhmm. B: Understand, again, you are creating your past and your future from your present. And when you change the idea of yourself in the moment, everything changes. Your entire universe: all of its past; all of its future. Do you follow me? Q: Instantaneously create that. B: In other words, recognize there are parallel realities in which the idea of Atlantis did not destroy itself. Q: Mhmm. B: And you could just as likely say, "well, my perception is that Atlantis didn't destroy itself." And I would just as easily say, "you are right." Q: In my perception. B: In your reality. Q: In your reality it did destroy itself. B: In the reality that we share with the idea of co-creating the reality you have decided to share with us, it did. Q: I understand. B: However, recognize that both are real. There is an Atlantis that did not destroy itself; and there is an Atlantis that did. And both are real. It is not this or that. It is this and that. "The" truth is composed of all truths: this and that. And the one that is yours is the one you experience, plain and simple. Q: Right. The truth will not... we're not going to travel to your planet; we're going to evolve to the ability to create an experience... B: It is not impossible to travel to our planet; that is also a truth. Q: Mhmm. But aren't you presenting - or we are presenting to ourselves - an invitation to create the reality of which you speak? B: Yes. To shift yourself to the reality that contains that, if that is what you need. Q: Okay. And the physical - we're not going to meet physically - or this concept that we will not meet physically... B: When you say "we," recognize that the /you/ that is saying that is not the /you/ that might meet us. Q: I understand. B: Therefore, you cannot really make that statement. Q: Well, I can make the statement. I made it. But I... B: We mean in the sense that it is true for you right now, that the /you,/ you are /now/ is not meeting us. Q: Yes. B: But if, so to speak, you meet us, it is not the same you. Q: Of course. B: Therefore, it is not the /you,/ you are now that will meet us. Even if you do meet us, it will be another you. Q: I understand. B: Thank you. Q: What is it - I don't like to use the word judgment, but you're saying, when we consider ourselves equal to you... B: Yeees? Q: Then we will meet physically. B: Yes. Simply: when you become equal to the vibration of the reality that is defined by us meeting physically, that is the reality you will experience. We are projecting our reality to be that reality, that vibration. In a sense, we are already meeting you - the you_s_ that you will be when we meet you. Q: Right. Our chosen path is to develop more of the spiritual awareness of ourselves... B: And choose what reality you wish to experience to fulfill the idea of what you are. Q: Outside of that, validation of the physical is senior to our subjective viewpoint. B: Everything is your subjective viewpoint. Q: Okay, but that's what we're coming to. B: Understood. Q: Okay. Thank you. Q2: Where is the Atlantis that did not destroy itself? B: In parallel realities. Do you understand the concept? Q: I understand the concept, but I can't do anything with it. B: All right. Then that is doing something with it, that you need to do. Q3: What are you doing with your hands when you're listening and talking? B: Nothing...I, in my physical form, am perfectly still. Q: What do you do with the channel's hands? B: I am not doing anything with them. The reaction that you may see, as you exemplify the idea, is simply, let us say, in increasing the pulsation of my mentality so that the physiological body, by definition, must translate the extra energy in some way, shape and form, if it cannot be translated vocally. Q: Mhmm. I see. B: Does that answer your question? Q: Yes it does. Thank you. B: Thank you.