Overcoming Inertia:
28 January 88

BASHAR:  All right, I'll say: how are you all this evening of your time, as
you create time to exist?  Are you all alive?

Audience:  Yes. Yes.

B:  Thank you!  Allow us to lay down some foundations for this interaction
this evening of your time.  And if I may say so now, I will be a little bit
more long-winded than usual.  The idea is simply that there are a couple of
ideas that we wish to discuss.

 The first one shall be a very important point for many individuals, and
something that we will further a discussion of at other times as well. But
for now, it may simply be entitled, "Overcoming Inertia."

 Now: we are referring in our analogy to not only what you may call the
physiological form, the scientific definition of inertia, but also the
sociological form: the idea of overcoming what seems to be a sluggishness,
or an impedance, to you moving at the rate you prefer to move within the
endeavors you say you want to be involved within.

There is a similar definition for both.  This definition, with a very
slight change, can be applied not only to the scientific idea of inertia,
the physiological, the physics idea; but also the sociological one.

 Now: the idea as your society understands it, to put it on a very simple
level, is that inertia usually, as you say, represents the tendency of an
object to remain in the condition or the state that it is in, unless acted
upon by an outside force that moves it in another way.  The idea, however --
 to us, from our point of view -- is that inertia is the effect, an effect
that is created by the relative interaction between dissimilar frequencies
of matter.

To put it on the sociological level, and perhaps to underline the
physiological definition, social inertia -- that sluggishness, that slow
moving, that idea of having to overcome what seems to be obstacle -- is the
result of the effect that is created by the relative interaction between
dissimilar frequencies or states of being.  In other words, any time you
have, in a physiological object, non-homogenous, disassociated,
disconnected objects, each of those will have a different frequency, a
different idea, a different definition of itself relative to everything
else.


    And to define this analogy more clearly, let us take the notion of many
of your technological vehicles -- your spacecraft, your automobiles, and so
forth.  When you deal with inertia in the physiological realm that you live
in, it is usually defined by the following analogy.

 Let us say you have a vehicle; let's say for now it is simply a box, a
hollow box.  And there are passengers within it -- little objects that you
put in the box.  And now you take that box, you fling it with all your
might against a wall.  Now, you know what happens to the objects inside --
and sometimes even to the box itself.

 The idea is that the inertia of the objects at rest remain at rest.  And
when they impacted the wall, their motion was abruptly changed; and they
simply, as the motion keep going, rest relative to the box -- they were
still moving relative to the earth -- they kept going and smashed up
against the front of the box.

 Now all of you understand this example in physical terminology.
However: many of you have realized and recognized that within our
spacecraft we seem to exhibit properties that would indicate that we are
inertia-free; that these craft can move at many thousands of mile per hour;
and can abruptly, or execute very sharp turns, at seemingly no harm to the
occupants. The reasons for this goes back to the definition we have given
to inertia. That it is an effect created by the relative interaction
between dissimilar frequencies of matter.

   So: what we have done in our technology is to create a type of field, a
type of energy. We have created the crafts substance and the occupants'
substance and the air within the craft -- its substance -- to all operate
on the same frequency.  So it all becomes ethereal matter. Thus the
spacecraft the air within it and all of the occupants, and any other
artifacts, all function as one homogenous substance.

 It is more analogous to the idea of having a solid block, rather than an
empty box full of separate particles.  Or it is perhaps more analogous to
the idea of taking that hollow box with all the separate occupants, and
filling it with a substance that immobilizes everyone.

So that it does act like a solid object; when you throw it against the wall
-- because they are immobilized -- all the objects within the box simply
cannot move because they are held within a type of pressure field.


Now this does not mean we cannot move around within the craft. It simply
is, however, that the atmosphere within the craft -- and I do not
necessarily just mean the breathable substance, but the entire energy
atmosphere of the craft, the entire energy reality-- is of one vibratory
frequency.

Therefore the entire craft functions as if it were a solid object.  So it
can stop abruptly, it can make right angle turns, and the occupants do not
even know they are moving.  Because relative to the craft they are
immobilized within that energy reality.

   Sociological inertia can be similar. The only reason there is resistance
and friction in your life is because you may not be of the same frequency
as the idea, the event, the vehicle, you say you want to be a part of.

Therefore, if you are traveling at one rate because of your definition of
yourselves; and the idea is traveling at another rate because of your
definition of /it/; then if it all of a sudden stops or takes a right angle
turn, you are usually turned into emotional jelly.

The idea, therefore, is to begin to understand that the way you overcome
that inertia is to -- as we have said many times, in many different ways --
accelerate and uplift your vibratory frequency to match that of the event
in your life you say you desire.

    Be, in other words, equal to the idea; and do not consider yourselves,
nor invalidate yourselves to be anything less than that idea. Then your
frequency will not be dissimilar.  You will not experience the idea of
resistance and friction in your sociological interactions

    And you will move in an accelerated manner, smoothly as one with the
event itself. Traveling, so to speak, through the changes in that event at
the speed of thought, in a very smooth, a very homogenous way.  Because you
and the event will be one solid idea.  Not made of various components that
can become jumbled up and detached; but one interconnected homogenous idea.

So: the way we have discussed many times to do this is, of course, in
accelerating your energy.  It is doing the thing in your life that excites
you the most; and knowing that when something does excite you, it is who
you are.  And feeling equal to that idea. That's too big for me; I can't
handle that; I don't deserve that.  That's going to be difficult."

"I have to overcome this and this and this in order to do that.  I'll never
be good enough."   And many other ideas that keep your frequency lower --
or at least different -- than the idea you say could be so exciting.

 Be at one with your vehicle; and it will carry you anywhere, as fast and
far as you want to go. Smoothly, effortlessly and with absolutely  no
inertia to overcome.  Because you'll be on the same track in the same
frequency.  Everything will be, in your terms, no longer, quote/ unquote,
differently relative.

    It will all be from the one point of view that you desire to be. And
your vehicle will then be seen to be an extension of you.  Even as we
understand that; even though we use the format you call space craft, we
know they are literally an extension of us -- even as any physiological
object is.

 Your own rocket ships, your own automobiles, your own airplanes, your own
boats -- any vehicle, any idea - your own bodies: they are an extension of
the idea that you are; they are a representation of the idea that you are.
And they are absolutely representative of the frequency you operate on and
the acceleration that you believe is possible in your life.

 Second idea: to add some more wind into the conversation. There will be,
and have been for a while, many ideas now coming up regarding the issue of
spirit versus will.  All right. There are many, many areas of information
that are now coming into your society regarding the notions of spirit and
will.

     And for a long time, your world has been denied the idea in many ways
and in many forms, of what you call your physical consciousness when you
deal with spiritual matters.

    The idea we have outlined many times is simply that you cannot really,
quote/unquote, become more overall spiritual by denying one level of
spirituality, one level of reality... the physical reality.