*Methodology of Karma*


Q:  You shared an experience with us in which you took responsibility once
for another person's actions. And in order to balance this act which
occurred in the now, you went back into one of your past lives, presumably
in an alternate time track, and produced a disease.

Now, if you create your universe, if you create your own reality, if the
universe reflects whatever belief system you have: why didn't you change
your reality or belief system, such that the issue of integrity, or the
balancing of actions, did not enter? Now, if you could not do that, it must
be that there must be some absolute cosmic laws, which must be adhered to;
if that's the case, then believing in your own reality is limited to
adhering to these cosmic laws, or at least within the universe. If there
are, what are they? If there are not any absolutes in the universe...

B:  All right. Thank you.

Q:  ...then why did you adopt that belief system that you...

B:  Thank you. Recognize, first of all, that the so-called absolutes for
all universes is but one - the fact that you exist.

Now, each and every universe can create its own apparent absolutes, to some
degree. And by that particular rule - by those particular rules of that
particular game - then there are generally agreed-upon absolutes that will
generally be followed. And in abiding by those, you will then maintain the
balance of the energy within the total game that you are playing.

That is also dissolvable, but only when you extract yourself from that
universal absolute that you have agreed to create. They are not absolute
absolutes, but they will appear to be just as solid as a so-called
absolute, as long as you agree in general to abide by them.

Within the universe in which I exist, I agree to abide by the notion of the
balancing in that way - that there were scenarios in my past life, wherein
the playing out of certain positive and negative ideas was, quote/unquote,
acceptable then. And therefore, any idea that would fit into allowing that
being I was then, to learn what it needed to learn through that particular
understanding, or disease, at that time, was put, in your terms, into good
use.

Q:  Is karma an absolute law in the same sense?

B:  No, except in the sense that it is only a representation of a momentum,
karma is completely self-imposed; the idea, the methodology, so to speak,
of the karma are completely self-imposed. The so-called absolute within the
universal game is simply that it will represent a momentum, a balance, a
carry through of an idea once initiated. How it carries through and how it
balances out can occur in many different ways. You follow me?

Q:  Yes.

B:  The karmic absolute is simply that the energy, once initiated, will
carry through as a momentum; but how that plays itself out will depend upon
the reasoning within any given life that requires that manifestation, and
can use that manifestation to learn something from. In other words, the
generation of that balance point that I created was usable in one of my
past lives. So I allowed it to stand, in that way, knowing that that past
life had the belief systems that would generate that type of reality. And
therefore, it could use that type of reality to learn that it did not need
to create that type of reality anymore.

And that is what allowed me to maintain the existence that I do now, where
I know I am the creator of my reality; for, the me that had the disease,
was not in cognition that they were the creator of their reality. And the
disease allowed them to learn that, so that I could be who I am today. You
follow me?

Q:  Yes.

B:  Does that assist you?

Q: Yes, it does. The personality in that previous life was in an alternate
time frame: was that personality associated with your soul? In that case,
does that mean that one's soul has multiple numbers of personalities and
multiple time tracks?

B:  Oh, absolutely, the oversoul has an infinite number of fragments. It
may choose to project these fragments into any given game at any given
moment.

Q:  In an infinite number of time tracks.

B:  Yes.

Q:  If the soul is that infinite, what comes after the soul? What could be
more infinite that that?

B:  Nothing. But you are assuming that there is an after, and there isn't.
Everything only is - now, simultaneously. The notion of a before and an
after is one of the games you are playing.

Q:  It's my understanding that there comes a point in evolution where one
no longer needs a soul. Is that true?

B:  One is a soul, in a sense. You may no longer need particular
manifestations of the spirit that you are, of the soul that you are. But in
a sense, a soul is what you are, although there may be many different
definitions to that, many of which might be semantically arbitrary. Your
meaning of a soul, and a fifth-density being's meaning of a soul, might be
pointing to two different fluctuations of representations of energy.

B:  You follow me?

Q:  Thank you.

B:  Thank you. You are simply consciousness, if you will. You will always
be that - in whatever way you choose to manifest yourself. Thank you.