*Harvesting*


Q:  I'd like to discuss harvesting.

B:  Harvesting!

Q:  Of entities from the third density to the fourth density...

B:  Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.

Q:  Okay.  Am I correct, then, that those entities that are polarized
towards service to others must be at least 51% oriented towards that
service to other selves in order to be harvestable to positive fourth
dimensional levels?

B:  In a sense; but recognize, first of all, we would suggest -- not tell
you: 'tis up to you -- we would suggest that that which, in your
terminology, you call "harvest," you might wish to simply stick to
"transformation," for harvest implies that something is going to be done
/to/ you, instead of /from/ you.  You follow me?

Q:  Yes, but my understanding was that many entities would be transformed
at the same time.

B:  Yes, but that is your doing in the sense of your desire to express that
fourth density state.  Now there will be -- perhaps -- a few entities that
will remain in third density.  That is their choice.  It is our perception
that the majority of the individuals upon your planet will kick over into
fourth density when they need to.

At this time everyone has a different rate of acceleration into that idea
of service, but, in general, the overall average rate will seem to project
that within the span of approximately the next 27 of your years, the
majority of your planet will all arrive in that fourth density state.  You
follow me?

Q:  Yes.

B:  That is our perception of the energy.  Generally speaking, yes, 51%, by
definition, in your terms, is required.  But it is not something that is
difficult to do.  For you are, at any given time, 100% of an overall idea
that you are being; and if you were simply /being/ that idea of service,
knowing that by being of service you are automatically served, then you are
100% in that way.  You follow me?

Q:  Those people that are more oriented towards service to self?

B:  If they choose to remain in the idea of third density, there can be
many different occurrences that can be perceived.  The idea can simply be
that they will, in their own time, physically die out and simply not be
reincarnated in your fourth density world, but reincarnate in a third
density version, or parallel, earth.   Or they can, literarily,
physiologically, disappear.  Or vice versa.

Q:  Could that affect them while they're still in their third density
entity?  For instance, someone who is oriented more towards self, and has
problems relating to that, could that develop into forms of cancer?

B:  Oh, yes.

Q:  How would one who feels himself to be a healer, help one who he cares
for who is orientated in that direction?

B:  Thank you!  First of all, by recognizing that a healer recognizes that
the healer assists others to heal themselves.  You follow me?

Q:  Yes.

B:  Then secondly: that you cannot force anything on anyone else. Nor do
they have to choose your point of view.  The way to assist them, let us
say, best is to first of all and fundamentally recognize that whatever it
is they are doing -- whether you label it fourth or third density or
otherwise -- is at that moment obviously what they believe they need to
explore to understand that portion of themselves.

So, first of all, trust in the fundamental indestructibility of that being.
  They will never come to ultimate harm, for they are eternal.  You follow
me?

Q:  No, I understand that...

B:   All right.  One moment.  Then from that attitude and point of view,
you can take the pressure off in terms of /needing/ them to become something
other than what they are.
Then you will go in radiating an attitude that will support them on an
underlying foundation that, no matter what they are doing -- including the
creation of what you call disease, cancer, any idea -- is something they
need to explore.  You can begin to assist them by asking them how does the
situation serve them?  How does it serve you?  How does it serve, in a
positive way, all who are in contact with that situation?

 What portions of themselves does this situation allow them now to face --
that perhaps they were not willing to face before the creation of the
disease?  For many times that is why your society creates disease, because
it has been taught to not face certain portions of its wholeness.  And in
not being willing to face its wholeness, it will then create situations
where it is /forced/ to face its wholeness.

Now, if an individual is willing to recognize that there is nothing they
can discover about themselves that they need to fear, then they will not
necessarily have to take such drastic measures in order to force themselves
to look at a certain portion that they have buried within their
subconscious -- to bring it to the surface through the drastic idea you
call disease.  If they are willing to face and integrate every portion of
their being that they could ever discover, then they will not need a
disease in order to discover those ideas, and they can allow themselves to
accept another, perhaps, a more positive delivery service for the message
that they are attempting to show themselves.   You follow me?

Q:  I do, but how do you help in instructing, or in helping an entity
learn?

B:  As we have already suggested, ask them what they are getting out of it
by having it in the first place?  Let them begin to explore that there is
possibly -- just possibly -- a positive reason for why they have it.  Let
them begin to explore how it might be positive, and then they can allow
themselves to expand their awareness to levels in which they can recognize,
that in order to discover what it is they think they need to discover, they
don't need the disease in order to do it.  You follow me?

Q:  Yes, I do.  Thank you very much.

B:  Does that assist you?

Q:  Yes, it does.

B:  Thank you!

Q:  Thank you.