*Genetic Manipulations*


Q:  Good evening.

B:  And to you, good day.

Q:  I would like to thank you and those members of your Association for the
continuance of this opportunity to engage in conversation with you.

B:  All right. There will be a brief amount of time for this transmission.
Proceed quickly.

Q:  Approximately 500,000 years ago it has been said that Homo erectus was
able to use fire for the first time in our current linear evolution. Was
that opportunity given to them by an outside source or was it just natural
evolution? Was it ET produced or...

B:  In terms of the original genetic manipulations that were created out of
the native hominid species, the move toward what you call Homo sapiens, in
that sense, you could say that it was artificially produced as an ability
to then discover that for themselves. You understand that?

Q:  Right. Okay.

B:  So they came upon it as a result of the genetic enhancement that
ultimately led to their capability to see things in that way.

Q:  And the Neanderthals originally had much larger nasal passages for
oxygenation and a larger brain. Why was that reduced?

B:  The idea, again, is that... there are a few different reasons. Some of
them environmental, some of them the results of the limitations imposed
upon the selves of the collective consciousness in that if you pretend that
you are not using it, then you do not need to manifest as much. You
understand that?

Q:  Yes.

B:  Also they were the results of certain genetic manipulations that were
deemed to be both (a) refinements of concentration, and (b) also the
weeding out of certain things that in certain strains were deemed to be
undesirable from their political point of view.

Q:  So the reduction of the oxygen intake would actually create more of an
analytical focus and reduce the brain mass?

B:  To some degree, yes; also, in that it was recognized that there would
be less oxygen on the planet.

Q:  I see.

B:  In the changes, it was redesigned to take the advantage of that idea,
whereas, in the past there was more. Now this would seem to be
contradictory in the sense of saying, why not reduce something, because if
there is more oxygen then you don't need as much, but
it doesn't work this way.

Q:  Right.

B:  You have to design the thing to be shaped for the environment itself,
otherwise it is not the vibration of that environment in direct reflection.


Q:  And the simian eyes, it has been said that that was one of the
limitations that was left with us?

B:  In that sense it is neither the idea of limitation or otherwise, it was
simply the material that was at hand to work with.

Q:  So the bigger eyes don't represent anything in particular?

B:  They represent what they represent in the archetypal expression left in
what you call the simian animal; in you they represent what they represent
in the archetypal representation of the human, and both of you see things
differently. As any animal will see differently than you do because of its
archetypal representation, or symbolic place within the collective
consciousness. It is not an issue of taking anything away from you, it is
an issue of simply that you need to be what you are designed to be.

Q:  And the reptilians, what DNA was used for their initial development?

B:  Many different forms of what you call dinosauria.

Q:  Not one particular species?

B:  There were some strains more than others. Such as what you would call
Troodonce and some of what you would call, the Raptors, and so forth. But
it is also a blend and a mixture over many different generations of
experimentation.

Q:  What electromagnetheric frequency do the reptilians vibrate at in our
current reality?

B:  They do not actually vibrate with a frequency that is /congruent/ with
your reality, so to give you a frequency would not be a one to one
correlation. If they were to project into your reality I could give you a
correlation, but it doesn't necessarily extrapolate directly or relate
directly to the frequency scale we often use to represent your frequency.

Q:  Are they mostly autonomous or are they servile?

B:  It is an odd and unusual combination of the two. You cannot really say
mostly, it is too blended to separate those concepts apart from one another
in their society. They are autonomous and they are, in many ways, servile;
it's their nature, in that sense, yet they are autonomous within it.

Q:  Right.

B:  Yet they are designed in a certain fashion. Their vibration relative to
your reality would be somewhere between 11,000 and 37,000 cycles per
second, but again, remember that is not a direct relationship to the
frequencies that we often give you. It is calculated in a very different
way that we will explain in a future date.

Q:  The last couple of things: the number six you have referenced as the
number of technology, can you explain that further?

B:  The idea is that it is based upon the vibration itself of atomic
structures and crystalline structures that are the bases, vibrationally,
for all things you understand to be technological in nature as an
expression in your reality.

Q:  So it's a molecular connection.

B:  In a sense, that is a simplistic way of saying it. We can also get into
that in more detail at another time.

Q:  The last thing is Saturn, it was the god of melancholy and it took on a
negative connotation in our past. We have the council of Saturn, which is
connected to the Council of Nine.

B:  Yes.

Q:  What brought on this negative definition?

B:  Simply forgetfulness and misinterpretation of the idea of what might
pass for melancholy, but in fact is simply /calm wisdom/, calm knowing. You
understand the difference?

Q:  Yes.

B:  Does this help you?

Q:  Yes, thank you very much.

B: Thank you.  We will once again...