Bashar: Channeled by Darryl Anka From "A New Habit" 11-21-97 "Frequency Domains" Q: When you say frequency... B: Yes? Q: You're talking about the vibrational rate of... B: Consciousness. Q: Consciousness. B: Yes, which creates a reality domain to reflect back to that consciousness the experience of itself, and allows it to experience itself as if it inhabited that domain that it is creating. Q: To me, frequency means an oscillation of something physical. B: Why? Q: Well, because that's physics, that's what frequency means. B: All right, but the concept is still transportable to even, what you might consider to be, more highly rarefied forms of energy. Q: Okay, but in that case, then if it's not a physical object vibrating at a certain oscillation... B: Yes? Q: ... then... B: Do you consider light to be a physical object? Q: Not necessarily. B: Does it then not vibrate? Does it not have a frequency or a variety of frequencies? Yes or no? Q: Aha. B: Shall we begin again? Q: Yes. B: Do you consider light to be a physical object? Q: Not necessarily. B: Does it vibrate? Does it oscillate? Does it have different frequency pitches? You know it does. Q: Well, it does, in the sense, as a result of the physical object that is creating that light. B: That is not the point. Q: No? B: The point is that even though the light itself may be connected to certain physical parameters in its creation, so to speak ... which is actually not true, but we'll go that way for now... still, yet unto itself, when the light effect is created, when light itself is measured even by your human instrumentation, it is seen to possess frequency. Q: Okay. B: Yes? Q: In terms, yes, of... B: Well? Then it doesn't necessarily require that a physical object, being a solid object, is the only thing that can possess the quality you call frequency. Q: Okay, so... B: Make sense? Q: It does. B: All right, then does that help you extrapolate the idea of frequency to the non physical realms, if you think of them more as energy domains that can still possess different frequencies? Does that help as an illustration? Q: Yes, I guess so, if I think in terms of wave oscillations. B: Yes. I understand that many of you may have difficulty in understanding the idea, because you ask the question, "oscillation of what?" Q: Right. B: And you have to envision some actual medium. But consciousness is the ultimate medium, and consciousness, in its variety of oscillations, is what creates the things that you call light and physical objects. Q: Okay. B: Do you follow? The idea of physical objects is one, just to speak hierarchically for a moment, one of the lowest levels of frequency domains; and almost everything else comes first, rather than the other way around. Rather than the physical objects creating light, it is light that gives birth to physical objects. Q: Okay. B: Do you follow? Just to speak linearly, but again, as with everything else, it is actually a simultaneous co-creation or co-reflection or relationship of one aspect of the infinite to another aspect of itself. But we will not go into that esoteric direction right now. All right, does this serve you? Q: Well, one other question. Do you do out of the body astral projection? B: Do you mean me, personally? Q: Yes, I do. B: Yes, I do, but again, it is not literally out of the body, but we understand what you mean. Q: So you could come here in astral form? B: Oh, I have many times. Q: Could you do it right now? B: I am. Q: So, your astral body, so to speak, is somewhere in this room, and all of us are... B: Well, it is in a version of what you refer to as a room. Q: Okay, and could you, if you wished, slow down the vibrational rate of your astral body and materialize? B: In time, yes ... not now, in time. This is part of the idea, anyway, of contact. Because remember that our species anyway exists at a higher frequency rate than yours does, and slowing our frequency down, to some degree, is a part of your ability to perceive us physically, anyway. But we will need you to raise your frequency up to a certain degree to, in some senses, meet us halfway before it will be appropriate, and so that your system will not, in a sense, experience shock at being overwhelmed by too high a frequency. This is not a judgment but simply a description of physical contact. Do you follow that? Q: I do. Thank you, Bashar. B: For us, the idea also at this point in our evolution of astral existence and physical existence is almost the same thing, because we are evolving into something more non- physical. So, in that sense, the idea of astral projection is almost our normal experience. Do you follow? Q: I do. B: Thank you.