*Existence Always Exists*






Q:  You've mentioned that all things exist simultaneously. Is that in
potential, or actually kinetically, that all things are going on right now?
And if so... well, go ahead and answer that one.


B:  Oh... yes. Although from your point of view, there may appear to be
only potential. But from their own point of view they are just as
/realized/ as you think /you/ are.

Q:  All right. What keeps them suspended? What keeps my childhood going? Is
it float consciousness, just something that's suspended consciousness?

B:  It is, in a sense, simpler than that. It is simply that existence
always exists. Anything that has ever existed always will. But because of
the way you have defined the way you will experience your time frame, then
you do not need to be consciously aware of its continued existence in your
point of view. So it gets conveniently pigeonholed where it will not
interfere with you immediately. In other words, it is another way of simply
recognizing a phrase you already have on your own world, where when you
have chosen to experience the idea of limitation, you create the idea you
call time, so you do in fact keep everything from /happening all at once/.

Q:  Does it require energy, from me personally, to keep that going?

B:  In a sense, yes, but that does not mean it is a depleting idea. You are
simply supporting that by agreeing to be in this reality.

Q2:  Is it like a movie set where the crew has moved on... kind of?

B:  Well, sort of... but it is also still going on. Perhaps the analogy,
once again, of the motion picture film with which you are familiar is
helpful. Recognize that even though, let us say, in the beginning of the
film you have experienced the scenario of the childhood, and later on the
scenario of the adulthood, just because you are now watching the scenario
of the adulthood does not mean that the frames of the childhood do not
still exist simultaneously, and are not intact, because they are. And all
you need to do, in that sense, is run the film back through and in front of
the light of the projector to reactivate that idea.

Q2:  That's focus.

B:  Focus is /all it is./


Q2:  Would that be true also of the parallel universes?


B:  Yes.

Q:  So it exists, in a sense, as a /potential/ re-creation? In other words,
as you said, focus.

B:  So to speak, yes.

Q:  Okay, now in dimensions senior to time, where... I don't know if that's
a particular echelon of me, or you, or other life... things will exist
instantaneously while they are being created, would they not?

B:  Yes.

Q:  And then when the attention is moved from that (clicking fingers) - is
fully and completely removed - it doesn't exist as suspended perception. Is
that true? Is that a good description?

B:  In a sense, yes.

Q:  But in the more material, polarized dimensions that involve time,
space, and illusions, of directions and flowing and cause and effect, then
those things would tend to be thicker - using that term for condensed. So
it would tend to stay more in "persistence," is that true... in the worlds
of time?

B:  So to speak, yes.  Thank you!

Q:  Thank you.