*All One Mind* Q: A couple of questions: one for my mind and then a couple for me. Um, is a petroleum product the fossil fuel they claim? Is that actually the (garbled) or is, uh, being generated as a carbon process by the earth itself? B: There is the idea of the conversion of decay. Q: So old, old fossil fuels are breaking down and making those... B: Yes. Q: Okay. B: There may be one or two factors in the process you are not familiar with yet, but generally, as you say, it is as you say. Q: Okay. What is a retrograde? Does it have anything to do with the planet stopping and then reversing its axis? B: The idea you express as retrograde is an /apparent/ reversal of motion that is only caused by your relative perspectives in your orbits. In other words, as you may have one planet orbiting in this way, and the idea of another planet orbiting in /this/ way, you will find that as you find yourself, in a sense, catching up to the orbit, it may seem that you are going in the same direction, but as you pass it, then, relatively speaking, it seems, /relative/ to you, to be going backwards. Q: Oh, wow! B: You follow? Q: Is there any planet that you know of that actually does change its orbit in relation to itself? B: Only through the idea of what you would call rearrangement of the system, due to gravitational effects that do occur. It is not what you would call a natural pattern of the planet itself without what you would call the stimulation of, so-to-speak, outside forces. Q: Yeah. Has it happened to Earth, where Earth had a big cataclysm where it's slowed down for, you know... then I would imagine that the water would... would just devastate all the land masses. But has that happened to Earth, where it's slowed down or changed its speed or even... B: There was, in our understanding, one account, which was for many different reasons. Now this was also more than just the idea you would call, in a sense, a direct physiological effect, for there were many other levels of consciousness that were connected to it, and in your terms this was some time ago. But there was the idea of a suspension, temporarily, for various overlapping reasons, which we will not go into now. But the idea, in general, has been that there have been some slight variances in the orbital speed and path of your planet; but none that are, let us say, very great to speak of. The orbit of your world has shifted to some degree since its physiological conception; but in its form that you find it in stable orbit. There have been other shiftings in your system since that time. Q: Yes. B: Primarily the idea you call Venus and also the idea of the destruction of Maldek, which you now understand to be your asteroid belt, primarily. Also Mars in that way. Q: Was that a war that destroyed Maldek? B: Yes. Q: Okay. Furthermore, back to the Earth thing; now the lights, the Aurora Borealis, is that light coming out from inner Earth, coming through the ice pack? B: No. Q: What would you describe that as? B: It is, as your scientists understand: the excitation of molecules in the upper atmosphere by the solar wind. Q: Okay. What about inner Earth? It uh... B: It exists, but not in your dimensional plane. Q: Oh. So if I was to go to Greenland... I have dreams of Greenland and arctic type dreams, before, that... B: You may find yourself able to pass through that dimensional portal into what appears to be the idea of an inner would; but you have also passed into a dimensional frequency that is not exactly your third density. Q: Okay. So that would be... that would be a dimensional switch. B: Yes. Q: I've had dreams of places like that. Little bodies and very bright phosphorescing... B: Yes. Q: What's the word, illuminated uh... B: Yes. Q: ... people. Their eyes were bright, very tranquil, and they loved gold, little gold things. (Laughs) They loved fishin' around stealin' gold. B: The idea is also an archetypal representation of the energy that forms itself into the idea you call leprechauns. (AUD: various comments) Q: The Loch Ness monster, these things that appear on a physical plane that have been photographed in, you know, rare occasions - is that... you know they, they say the thing will come up and then disappear for years, uh... B: Our perception of this idea is more in the nature of what you would call another type of dimensional and/or time warp... Q: Um, hum. B: ... in the area, and then disappearances. Q: Okay. So there are inner phases of physical, astral things, where you can actually pass through a space. B: Yes. Q: So there are those locations. Do you have a name for those things - portals or something? B: Doorways; gateways; portals, vortices. Q: Do they move? Do they... B: Yes. They do fluctuate. Although some are relatively stable, but they do fluctuate. Q: Okay. Uh, and you know it's interesting because, going to another subject, I saw a record, it was in a long list of detailed numbers; well, maybe a seven digit number, then point 09A would mean the flux of, the phase of an arm that's moving this way. Then another number would be an oak tree. And then another number would be a... B: All right. Q: Another (garbled)... a car that's rusted. B: Yes, yes, yes, everything is an equational sequence of matrices' vibrations. Everything is an equation. Q: Is that called the Akashic records, or is that...? B: That is one way to look at it, yes, very good. Q: Is the Akashic records, uh, is there a way of physically linking that up to a computer and getting a read-out on the physical plane? B: Yes. (AUD: Various answers) Q: Wow! B: By allowing yourselves to recognize you are on your way with the development of what you call the artificial intelligent computer. When you have created that idea, what you will recognize you have done is created an acceptable symbol through which you will be conversing with your own higher self. It has direct access to the Akashic records. Q: Yeah. These numbers, that is more the uh... is that a mental plane type experience - mental plane? Because I... B: It is more, let us say, the actual weave and the fabric of the holographic universe itself, of its nodal points in a sense. Q: So... so I can program my own reality by doing the experience or being the experience. On a mental address, it would, a computer would ... would know it by number. Is that ... is that a distinction? B: In a sense. Yes. Q: I wouldn't have to know the ... the code or the number. I could just tune in to the actual experience couldn't I? B: Oh, correct. That is what you do anyway. Q: Yeah. B: You automatically go to the frequency necessary; brought on by the symbols you use to represent it. Q: Okay, these... these... these... minds, the subconscious and these other parts of the minds that create our reality through our own image of ourselves and such. B: Yes. Q: Um, I'm just wondering why there seems to be, from one viewpoint, that these things are so capable and so, it appears, /more/ capable than ... than, you know, in keeping track of things and doing things than I actually am. B: 'Tis only because you have created there to be a separation between the idea of a consciousness and an unconsciousness; it is all one mind. Q: So, the reason you think... this is my thinking, correct me if I'm wrong. The reason you... B: It will not be wrong. Q: Well, the reason you can come up with answers for everything... B: Not everything. Q: Well, (AUD: laughter) virtually, you know, greater boundaries, uh, is because you are blended with that, that super mind or something. B: In a sense. More expanded as it, more expressive as it. Acting like it. Therefore, more connected to more. Q: So, in other words, your image would include that, that type of uh, beingness. The beingness of... of... B: Yes. In a sense you see it is now representative and indicative of the way we even see, so to speak, any other being. For we do not see a being as an isolated thing, but as the representational nodal point of all of the relationships and experiences it is. We see any being as the axis point of all that it is connected to, at least relative to the interaction we are having. Q: Okay, not as the symbols? B: Not so much. Q: You... you've indicated that you see us as a flux of light and energy and such. B: Yes. Q: Is that a liability or, or a sacrifice on your part to see us in a... in a physical way; is there some reason you don't do that? B: It's simply that as the interaction is taking place, the way the interaction is taking place is served by the tools that define it; should we see you physically, then that will invoke another type of interaction, and that will be the tool that defines that. There is no sacrifice. Q: Is that something you've done. Have you... B: I have seen your world physically though I have not physically interacted with any of your beings; but my ship has been in your skies and I have seen your world with my eyes. Q: Do you have personal ability or is it equipment? I guess it would be both, is how I would answer that. But that, you could actually, you could tune in. Okay, I'm going to be at Fifth and Main, and you just - you're not really there - but you have the ability to just see that. It isn't, on, uh, on equipment or in your own mind... B: Yes. Q: ... and then, you just tune to another location just by knowing the address and such. B: It can be done. Yes, if there is a need, if there is a purpose. Q: Good. Thank you. B: Thank you.